BFSPY has a local implementation for nox task test:coverage:
- The docstring for function
coverage() is “Runs all tests (unit + integration) and reports the code coverage"
- While the implementation of
_coverage() calls _unit_tests(session, config, context)
Questions
- Is this (local) Nox task still required wrt. the PTB's default implementation?
- Should the PTB be updated?
- Should code coverage only be evaluated by Sonar?
BFSPY has a local implementation for nox task test:coverage:
coverage()is “Runs all tests (unit + integration) and reports the code coverage"_coverage()calls_unit_tests(session, config, context)Questions