Bump Paimon 1.3.1 and enable Paimon tests for Spark 4.0#7255
Draft
pan3793 wants to merge 8 commits into
Draft
Conversation
pan3793
force-pushed
the
paimon-1.3.1
branch
from
8fdb417 to
6add92c
Compare
Member
Author
|
Convert to draft due to compatibility issues (some functionalities are broken, though the API has not changed) and known packaging issues. |
|
Thanks for the PR! This PR is being closed due to inactivity. This isn't a judgement on the merit of the PR in any way. If this is still an issue with the latest version of Kyuubi, please reopen it and ask a committer to remove the Stale tag! Thank you for using Kyuubi! |
# Conflicts: # pom.xml
github-actions
Bot
added
the
kind:infra
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Why are the changes needed?
Paimon 1.3 supports Spark 3.2 to 4.0
https://paimon.apache.org/docs/1.3/spark/quick-start/
How was this patch tested?
GHA.
Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling?
No