Skip to content

ci(mergify): upgrade configuration to current format#460

Open
mergify[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
mergify/configuration-deprecated-update
Open

ci(mergify): upgrade configuration to current format#460
mergify[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
mergify/configuration-deprecated-update

Conversation

@mergify
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@mergify mergify Bot commented Apr 2, 2026

Hey there! 👋

We've noticed that your Mergify configuration is using some deprecated fields.

No worries—we've got your back! This automated PR updates your config to align with the newest standards, ensuring everything keeps running smoothly.

Do not procrastinate! You must upgrade your configuration before 2026-07-31, otherwise your configuration will stop working.

What's Changed?

Why This Matters

Keeping your configuration up-to-date means you'll benefit from the latest features and improvements Mergify has to offer. Plus, it helps prevent any unexpected hiccups down the road.

Got Questions? We've Got Answers! 🙌

Is this update safe to merge?

Absolutely! We've made sure the changes are compatible with your current setup. Your workflows should continue to work just as before—if not better!

Do I need to do anything special after merging?

Nope! Just merge this PR, and you're all set. If you have any custom configurations, it's a good idea to give them a quick look to ensure everything's in order.

What if I run into issues or have concerns?

We're here to help! Feel free to reach out to our support team anytime.

Thanks for being awesome and keeping your configuration up-to-date! If you have any thoughts or need a hand, don't hesitate to let us know.

Happy merging! 🎉

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

github-actions Bot commented Apr 2, 2026

Gatling

Generated: 2026-04-02T00:43:42.755Z

Simulation: simulations.BasicSmithy4PlaySimulation

Status: Completed (KO/OK summary unavailable from binary simulation.log)

Console summary:

---- Requests -----------------------------------------------------------------------|---Total---|-----OK----|----KO----
---- Global Information -------------------------------------------------------------|---Total---|-----OK----|----KO----
> OK: t < 800 ms                                                                                          2,375 (92.77%)
> OK: 800 ms <= t < 1200 ms                                                                                   0     (0%)
> OK: t >= 1200 ms                                                                                          184  (7.19%)
> KO                                                                                                          1  (0.04%)
Reports generated, please open the following file: file:///home/runner/work/smithy4play/smithy4play/smithy4play-gatling/target/gatling/basicsmithy4playsimulation-20260402004306107/index.html
Global: percentage of successful events is greater than or equal to 99.0 : true (actual : 99.9609375)
[info] Simulation BasicSmithy4PlaySimulation successful.
Metric Value

Report (artifact path): /home/runner/work/smithy4play/smithy4play/smithy4play-gatling/target/gatling/basicsmithy4playsimulation-20260402004306107/index.html
Artifact: gatling-report (download from this workflow run)

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

github-actions Bot commented Apr 2, 2026

Benchmarks (JMH)

Generated: 2026-04-02T00:48:02.971Z

Benchmark Mode Cnt Score Units
BlobBenchmarks.blobSizeCheck avgt 10 0.659 ± ns/op
BlobBenchmarks.createBlobLarge avgt 10 2.354 ± ns/op
BlobBenchmarks.createBlobMedium avgt 10 2.350 ± ns/op
BlobBenchmarks.createBlobSmall avgt 10 2.357 ± ns/op
BlobBenchmarks.createEmptyBlob avgt 10 0.375 ± ns/op
BlobBenchmarks.lazyBlobAccessSimulation avgt 10 5045.117 ± 49.880 ns/op
BlobBenchmarks.lazyBlobCreationSimulation avgt 10 0.651 ± ns/op
CodecResolutionBenchmarks.checkIsJsonOnlyEndpoint avgt 10 1.582 ± ns/op
CodecResolutionBenchmarks.preComputedJsonOnly avgt 10 0.372 ± ns/op
CodecResolutionBenchmarks.resolveJsonOnlyNoHeaders avgt 10 3.765 ± ns/op
CodecResolutionBenchmarks.resolveJsonOnlyWithJsonAccept avgt 10 71.444 ± ns/op
CodecResolutionBenchmarks.resolveMultipleTypesNoHeaders avgt 10 126.905 ± ns/op
CodecResolutionBenchmarks.resolveMultipleTypesWithHeaders avgt 10 148.487 ± ns/op
PathParsingBenchmarks.parseComplexPathNaive avgt 10 445.262 ± ns/op
PathParsingBenchmarks.parseComplexPathOptimized avgt 10 327.813 ± ns/op
PathParsingBenchmarks.parseEmptyPath avgt 10 1.080 ± ns/op
PathParsingBenchmarks.parseMediumPathNaive avgt 10 284.119 ± ns/op
PathParsingBenchmarks.parseMediumPathOptimized avgt 10 98.790 ± ns/op
PathParsingBenchmarks.parseRootPath avgt 10 1.249 ± ns/op
PathParsingBenchmarks.parseSimplePathNaive avgt 10 169.942 ± ns/op
PathParsingBenchmarks.parseSimplePathOptimized avgt 10 18.402 ± ns/op

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants